View Work Plans - Year 2
View Work Plan Data
Year 2 - Institutional Engagement (Oregon Institute of Technology)
Institutional Objectives - Outcome to be achieved
A: Define the process and timeline of general education review, informed by the wide body of knowledge available on the topic.
B: Engage in a university wide dialogue on general education.
C: Obtain a clear picture of where and how particular competencies are expected, enhanced or assessed.
Linkages - Related institutional initiatives/projects
A: Provost's charge to review general education requirements (1/9/13).
B: Provost's charge to review general education requirements (1/9/13).
C: Provost's charge to review general education requirements (1/9/13).
Processes - How outcome will be achieved
A: The General Education Review Committee begins this work by conducting an extensive literature review. Seeking best practices to define the process.
B: Solicit input from campus constituents through focus groups and surveys. Provide regular progress reports to a wide variety of campus groups.
C: Curricular mapping of general education course outcomes to the Institutional Student Learning Outcomes (ISLOs) and DQP outcomes, to assess the coherence of the curriculum.
Progression - Milestones and dates to achievement
A: April 2013--Committee begins discussion
April-September 2013--Literature review
June 2013--Identify practical outcomes and draft timeline
September 2013--Create detailed plan for work to be completed in 2013-14
B: Fall 2013--Focus groups with faculty and staff
Winter 2013--Survey of current students
September 2013-May 2014--Regular reports to various campus committees
C: January-February 2014--General education faculty from the five content areas (math, communication, humanities, science, social science) will form groups of teaching faculty to map course level outcomes to the ISLOs and the DQP.
Responsibility - Lead person / office
A: Sandra Bailey, Director of Assessment
B: Sandra Bailey, Director of Assessment
C: Sandra Bailey, Director of Assessment
Year 2 - Horizontal Alignment (Oregon Institute of Technology)
Institutional Objectives - Outcome to be achieved
A: Obtain a clear picture of where and how particular competencies are expected, enhanced or assessed in the Applied Psychology program.
B: Participate in state and national alignment initiatives.
C: Focus on assessment of critical thinking within the various disciplines.
Linkages - Related institutional initiatives/projects
A: Program academic assessment
B: Assessment of Institutional Student Learning Outcomes
C: Assessment of Institutional Student Learning Outcomes
Processes - How outcome will be achieved
A: Curricular mapping of required course outcomes to the DQP outcomes to define outcomes in the Applied Psychology program.
B: Attendance at alignment meetings and participation in NILOA assignment alignment project.
C: Provide faculty professional development focused on creation of assignments aligned with criteria defined at the institutional level. Administer assessments in upper division courses in each program. Review results and make recommendations for continuous improvement.
Progression - Milestones and dates to achievement
A: Fall 2013--instructional faculty map required course outcomes to the DQP outcomes.
Winter 2014--Applied Psychology faculty define program student learning outcomes and create an assessment plan.
B: Oregon-ized Summit, September 2013 and January 2014
Multi-state Assessment Collaborative, June 2013, October 2013, December 2013
Submit potential assignments to NILOA, December 2013
Participate in NILOA assignment-design charrette, March 2014
C: Faculty professional development (Convocation 2013)
Assignment development workshops (Fall 2013)
Administer assessment in upper division courses in all programs (Winter 2014)
Faculty rating of student work done by groups of program faculty (Winter 2014)
Analysis of results and plans for continuous improvement (Spring 2014)
Responsibility - Lead person / office
A: Alisha Huntoon, Applied Psychology Program Director
B: Sandra Bailey, Director of Assessment
C: Sandra Bailey, Director of Assessment
Year 2 - Vertical Integration (Oregon Institute of Technology)
Institutional Objectives - Outcome to be achieved
A:
B:
C:
Linkages - Related institutional initiatives/projects
A:
B:
C:
Processes - How outcome will be achieved
A:
B:
C:
Progression - Milestones and dates to achievement
A:
B:
C:
Responsibility - Lead person / office
A:
B:
C:
