View Work Plans - Year 1

Please choose an institution

Only institutions with data are selectable

 

Year 1 - Institutional Engagement (Portland State University)

Institutional Objectives - Outcome to be achieved

A: Identify program (department) leaders.

B: Communicate Vertical Integration progress at AAC&U and engage institutional leadership.

C:

Linkages - Related institutional initiatives/projects

A:

B:

C:

Processes - How outcome will be achieved

A: Backwards Design--We will do the assessment AND then review results through the lens of the DQP. We will share the results with PSU leadership and hope to gain greater engagement. In particular, we reference the work of Peter Ewell in General Education reform where he points to the difficulties associated with sustaining assessment when it is abstract.

B:

C:

Progression - Milestones and dates to achievement

A: AAC&U presentation in spring 2013.
AAEEBL presentation in July, 20013.

B:

C:

Responsibility - Lead person / office

A: Gary Brown through June 2013.

B:

C:

 


 

Year 1 - Horizontal Alignment (Portland State University)

Institutional Objectives - Outcome to be achieved

A: One interdisciplinary 300 level course, 14 sections, will do assessment that engages faculty from multiple departments.

B:

C:

Linkages - Related institutional initiatives/projects

A: Ongoing assessment of institutional outcomes done with DQP post hoc framework analysis.

B:

C:

Processes - How outcome will be achieved

A: Collaborative assessment with external stakeholders.

B:

C:

Progression - Milestones and dates to achievement

A:

B:

C:

Responsibility - Lead person / office

A:

B:

C:

 


 

Year 1 - Vertical Integration (Portland State University)

Institutional Objectives - Outcome to be achieved

A: Institutional Objectives - Outcome to be achieved

A. Pilot assessment of sample of student's culminating projects using VALUE/DQP framework in four contexts, and in each context engage external partners from CCs:
1. University Studies (The Junior year and articulation inflection point)
2. SBA representing the comparison of DQP with professional accreditation outcomes
3. PA representing engagement and in context of high impact practice
4. GSE Administrative Licensure Program representing the BA/Graduate vertices and the opportunity to sound DQP with professional K-12 leaders.

B:

C:

Linkages - Related institutional initiatives/projects

A: Linkages - Related institutional initiatives/projects
B. The work reflects a year of work in online outcomes-based backwards design, a collaborative curriculum development process developed for coherence and efficiencies

B:

C:

Processes - How outcome will be achieved

A: Processes - How outcome will be achieved
A. The design process engaged faculty from four disciplines in the design. The work was initiated with the end in mind (Backwards design), and the VALUE rubrics were used anticipating the DQP potential and opportunity. In that sense, the workplan is embedded in the COL design process. The work will be analyzed and presented at the AAC&U meeting in Atlanta, as far as it is ready at that time.

B:

C:

Progression - Milestones and dates to achievement

A: Progression - Milestones and dates to achievement
A. The year one milestone will be assessed at the completion of the winter term and again in early January as work assessment is completed. It is likely that not all four programs will have the requisite work to report in early January.
B. Additional milestones will be determined after the anticipated reorganization PSU will implement in January, 2013.

B:

C:

 


 

Responsibility - Lead person / office

A: Responsibility - Lead person / office

A. Gary Brown, Associate Vice Provost will be co-leader
B. Molly Griffith, Project Coordinator, The Center for Online Learning

B:

C:

 

 

Get Adobe ReaderQuestion? Problems? Contact the DQP Webmaster